Week 1: Neutral issue reading
Understand the issue from every side before the policy, or your own view, shapes it.
Research skills · Self-serve
Policy brief research with a defence rehearsal
Five rooms: four research reports from named public sources and one simulation. The research is built around your own policy and situation and the simulation around your role and seniority. Unlimited attempts.
Start programPolicy officers, researchers, journalists and public affairs staff writing a policy brief for a decision-maker, at any level.
A self-serve program for policy officers, researchers and journalists writing a brief on a named policy, built on Renatus. Four research rooms and one simulation room · Five weeks, one room a week · Unlimited attempts · Ongoing thereafter.
Give Ren the issue named neutrally, its geographic scope and your role or perspective.
Give Ren the policy's exact name, its jurisdiction and your role.
Give Ren your role, the industry and sub-sector the policy touches, and the region and specific countries.
Give Ren the region, the specific countries and the industry exposure, and your role.
Calibration: your role title, the audience (a single senior stakeholder, a board, an executive committee, or a hostile external audience; pick the one closest to your reader), your industry, a line of working context, and your organisation's website if you want to give it.
You have a policy brief to write and a room to defend it in. A brief has to explain the issue without taking a side, explain what the policy does apart from what it claims, set out the rules it sits inside, and read the politics that will decide whether it survives. Then a minister, an editor, a committee or a client asks the question it did not cover, and you have moments to answer. This program prepares you through research and one defence. Ren researches the issue, the policy, the rules around it and the politics from public sources and writes four sourced reports, then plays a room that has not read the brief kindly and scores how you held it.
Understand the issue from every side before the policy, or your own view, shapes it.
Understand what the policy does, apart from what it claims.
Map the regulatory environment the policy sits inside, and find the change most likely to move it.
Rate the political risk around the policy, and know the signals that would show it arriving.
Hold the argument in front of a room that has not read it kindly.
0% Starting...