Australian E-Commerce Competitive
Landscape 2025–2026
Amazon Australia overtook eBay as the country's largest online marketplace in 2023 and has not looked back.
With 75.2 million average monthly site visits — 48% above eBay — and an estimated 4.5 million Prime subscribers, Amazon has built a loyalty flywheel that rivals cannot easily replicate. Its closest structural threat is not another pure-play marketplace but the supermarket duopoly: Woolworths and Coles are converting their physical store networks into fulfilment infrastructure, with Woolworths reporting 15.1% e-commerce penetration in Q4 FY2025 and Coles posting 5% sales growth in Q1 FY2026 through dedicated automated warehouses.
The market is not a simple two-horse race. A second tier — Kogan, Catch, and MyDeal — is fighting for marketplace seller loyalty through fee cuts and fulfilment subsidies, with MyDeal making the most aggressive moves after its acquisition by Woolworths. Meanwhile, ultra-low-price entrants Shein and Temu have captured 47% and 25% of 18–24-year-old shoppers respectively, applying downward price pressure across apparel and general merchandise that no incumbent has yet answered convincingly. The competitive structure that existed in 2023 is being rebuilt around logistics speed, supermarket integration, and platform economics — and the winners of those fights will define Australian e-commerce through 2028.
Three tiers define Australian e-commerce — and only the top tier has a durable moat.
Amazon leads on traffic, Prime loyalty, and product range. The supermarkets lead on grocery and physical fulfilment. Everyone else is fighting over the middle.
Australian e-commerce has a clear three-tier structure. At the top sits Amazon, which overtook eBay as the country's most-visited online marketplace in 2023 with 75.2 million average monthly visits — 48% above eBay's 50.9 million.[Ocean Port Link] Behind the two dominant marketplaces, Woolworths and Coles operate grocery-anchored online channels with expanding general merchandise ambitions. A third tier — Kogan, Catch, MyDeal, JB Hi-Fi, and The Iconic — competes for specific categories but lacks the traffic scale or fulfilment infrastructure of the top two.
The gap between tiers is not closing. Amazon's Prime membership, estimated at 4.5 million subscribers (roughly 45% penetration of eligible Australian households), creates a retention engine that compounds over time.[Ocean Port Link] The supermarkets' advantage is structural in a different way: they own the one category — fresh grocery — that no pure-play marketplace has cracked, and their store networks double as last-mile fulfilment hubs. Third-tier players are not losing ground catastrophically, but they are being squeezed from above by Amazon's product range and from below by ultra-low-price entrants Shein and Temu.
Market concentration is self-reinforcing. Australia Post's data identifies product range (64% of shoppers cite this as a reason to choose Amazon), trusted quality (58%), and efficient returns (49%) as the primary reasons shoppers default to established platforms.[Ocean Port Link] These advantages accumulate at scale — the more sellers a platform attracts, the wider the range, the better the prices, and the stronger the retention. Smaller platforms cannot replicate this loop without the capital to subsidise sellers and fulfilment simultaneously.
Each major player has a different mechanism for closing a sale — and most of them only work in one lane.
Amazon wins on membership loyalty. The supermarkets win on grocery habit. Kogan and Catch win on price — when they are cheaper.
The clearest strategic dividing line in Australian e-commerce is between platforms that win through membership economics and those that win through price. Amazon sits firmly in the first camp. Prime's 93% first-year retention rate means each new subscriber is likely to remain an active buyer for at least two years — a compounding advantage that makes customer acquisition cost far less important than for rivals who must re-win each transaction.[Saras Analytics] Tactics like Subscribe & Save, Brand Tailored Promotions targeting cart abandoners, and urgency messaging during Prime Day 2025 (which saw 27% year-on-year growth and a 128% increase in first-time customers) are designed to deepen that lock-in, not simply drive one-off sales.[Pattern AU]
The supermarkets operate a different model: they use grocery frequency to anchor the relationship, then extend wallet share into general merchandise. Woolworths' 15.1% e-commerce penetration in Q4 FY2025 reflects a customer base that already shops weekly for groceries and finds adding a household item to the same order frictionless.[Morningstar] Coles is replicating this with two dedicated automated warehouses that improve picking speed and delivery reliability — its Q1 FY2026 supermarket sales grew 5% against Woolworths' 2%, suggesting execution is currently sharper.[Morningstar] Neither supermarket has cracked general merchandise at Amazon's range depth, but that may matter less if grocery frequency keeps the customer relationship alive.
Kogan and Catch compete primarily on price in electronics, home goods, and apparel — a positioning that works when they are genuinely cheaper but collapses when Amazon or Temu undercuts them. Both platforms charge sellers relatively high commissions (10–20% depending on category), which limits how far they can discount without margin deterioration. The Iconic holds a defensible position in fashion through curation, brand partnerships, and a returns experience that commodity marketplaces have not matched — but it is not competing for grocery or electronics dollars.
MyDeal is using fee cuts as a weapon — and forcing Catch to respond rather than lead.
A 3–5 percentage point commission cut is not a promotion. It is a structural bet that lower seller costs will compound into GMV share.
The fight for third-party sellers is the most tangible competitive battle in Australian e-commerce right now. Sellers choose platforms based on three things: commission rates, fulfilment costs, and the size of the customer audience their listings reach. MyDeal — now backed by Woolworths' capital — moved aggressively in H2 2025, cutting commissions by 3–5 percentage points (electronics dropped from 12% to 9%), waiving its Premium seller fee through Q4, and reporting 20% seller onboarding growth as a result. The stated target is GMV of $1.4B in FY2026, up from an estimated $1.2B in FY2025.[Research data]
| Monthly Sub | Commission Low | Commission High | Fulfilment ($/unit) | 2025-26 Cut? | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Amazon AU
Prime audience
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MyDeal
Woolworths-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catch
Reactive cuts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kogan
Listing fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catch responded in October 2025 by cutting commissions 2% across electronics and home categories — a smaller move that signals awareness of the threat but not a comparable commitment. Amazon made a different kind of adjustment: a 5–10% reduction in FBA inbound placement fees for small and medium sellers in July 2025, positioning the cut as an efficiency improvement rather than a competitive response. Amazon's calculus is that Prime audience reach justifies higher total costs — sellers who want access to 4.5 million Prime members will pay a premium for it. Kogan made the smallest adjustment of the group, cutting commissions by 1% in high-volume categories in November 2025.
The risk for MyDeal is that fee cuts are easy to copy and hard to sustain without the margin from a parent company willing to subsidise growth. Woolworths is providing that subsidy, but the strategic logic only holds if cheaper seller fees translate into a wider product range, which attracts more buyers, which justifies the subsidy. That loop has not yet been proven at the GMV scale MyDeal is targeting — and if Woolworths' grocery margins come under pressure, the subsidy capacity narrows.
Buyer power is high and rising — Australian online shoppers switch platforms freely and reward whoever has the lowest price today.
Porter's Five Forces shows a market where incumbents are protected by logistics investment and data scale — not by product exclusivity or switching costs alone.
The most important structural dynamic in Australian e-commerce is that entry barriers are low at the storefront level but extremely high at the logistics and data layer. Any brand can list products on Shopify, but building a fulfilment network that delivers in two days across Australia's geographically dispersed population requires capital and time that most new entrants cannot mobilise. This asymmetry explains why Amazon, Woolworths, and Coles have held their positions despite years of challenger activity.
Supplier bargaining power is moderate and category-dependent. In consumer electronics and apparel, major brands can and do restrict where their products are sold — but most categories have enough alternative suppliers that no single brand can dictate platform terms. Cross-border supply chains, which account for an estimated 14.1% of Australian e-commerce sales, further reduce domestic supplier leverage by giving platforms access to international inventory at lower cost.[Ken Research]
The threat from Shein and Temu is the most underappreciated substitution risk. These platforms do not compete on range or trust — they compete on price so low that quality concerns become secondary. Their penetration among 18–24-year-olds (Shein at 47%, Temu at 25% in its first year) suggests they are building the shopping habits of the next decade's highest-value demographic.[Ocean Port Link] None of the established Australian platforms has mounted a credible response.
Amazon and the supermarkets occupy the high-ground — Kogan, Catch, and MyDeal are clustered in contested middle territory.
The white space is not in price or range. It is in trust, speed, and category depth — and only one or two players are in a position to own it.
- Amazon AU
- Woolworths Online
- Coles Online
- The Iconic
- eBay AU
- JB Hi-Fi Online
- Kogan
- MyDeal
- Catch
- Shein / Temu
Amazon sits in the top-right quadrant of the trust–range matrix, with the broadest product selection and the highest consumer trust scores among general merchandise buyers. Its 64% shopper preference on range and 58% on trusted quality place it structurally ahead of every other platform in combined trust and breadth.[Ocean Port Link] The supermarkets hold high trust but narrow range — they are trusted for grocery but not yet for the wide general merchandise categories Amazon owns.
Kogan, Catch, and MyDeal are tightly clustered: moderate trust, moderate range, and no single dimension where they clearly lead. This is the most dangerous position in a maturing market — these players are competing against each other more than against Amazon, and the fee-cutting battle they are waging reduces margins without expanding the addressable customer base. A platform in this cluster needs either a category breakthrough (The Iconic in fashion is the clearest example of escape) or a structural backer willing to fund growth (MyDeal via Woolworths). Without one of those two paths, the middle tier risks gradual irrelevance.
Three fights are being actively contested — grocery fulfilment, marketplace seller acquisition, and the under-25 price market.
The grocery battle is the most data-rich. The seller fee battle is the most structurally significant. The youth price battle is the most strategically ignored.
The grocery fulfilment battle is the most clearly evidenced of the three. Coles outperformed Woolworths on sales growth in Q1 FY2026 (5% vs 2%) by deploying two dedicated automated warehouses that improve picking speed and delivery reliability.[Morningstar] Woolworths is responding through discounting and loyalty points — its net promoter score improved 3 points quarter-on-quarter to 50, and October 2025 sales momentum recovered to 3%.[Morningstar] Analysts forecast Coles' edge narrowing by FY2027 as Woolworths' structural cost advantage enables deeper price cuts. This fight matters beyond grocery: whoever builds the most trusted, fastest fulfilment network in grocery has the infrastructure to expand into general merchandise at lower incremental cost.
The seller acquisition battle is less visible but more structurally significant. When MyDeal cuts commissions by 3–5 points and Catch responds with 2-point cuts, the real outcome is a compression of platform margins across the entire third tier. Sellers who move to lower-fee platforms do not necessarily bring their customers with them — they may simply arbitrage costs while maintaining listings across multiple platforms. Amazon's response to this dynamic is instructive: rather than cutting commissions, it reduced FBA storage fees to improve seller economics without touching referral rates, protecting the revenue model while reducing the operational cost complaint.
The under-25 price battle is the most strategically neglected. Shein's 47% penetration and Temu's 25% first-year Australian penetration among younger shoppers are not just market share statistics — they represent habit formation in a cohort that will be peak online spenders by 2030.[Ocean Port Link] No Australian platform has launched a credible structural response: no dedicated low-price storefront, no ultra-fast fashion vertical, and no visible investment in the social commerce formats (TikTok, Instagram) that drive Shein and Temu discovery. This gap is the clearest signal of where a challenger with the right product and capital could take share.
Amazon Australia's 1.6-star rating on ProductReview.com.au reveals the gap between Prime's promise and its delivery.
High retention and poor review scores can coexist — but the complaints signal where a challenger could win.
Amazon Australia holds a 1.6-star average rating on ProductReview.com.au from 2,504 reviews — one of the lowest scores for a major retailer on the platform.[ProductReview] The most common complaints centre on delivery delays (10–15 days for imported items despite Prime promises), product quality inconsistency for third-party marketplace listings, and difficulty reaching customer service. This low score coexists with Prime's reported 93% first-year retention rate — a paradox explained by the difference between dissatisfied customers who stay because switching is inconvenient and genuinely delighted customers who would never leave.
Comparative satisfaction data for Kogan, Catch, The Iconic, and Big W online is not available from named public sources in the 2024–2025 period covered by this research. The ProductReview.com.au data for Amazon is the only cross-verified public satisfaction signal in the evidence base. Confidence in broader cross-platform satisfaction comparisons is LOW — any ranking of competitors on customer experience would require data that is not publicly available from named platforms.
The Amazon complaint pattern is instructive regardless of comparisons: the gap between promised Prime delivery speed and actual import delivery timelines is a recurring, specific, addressable complaint. A platform that could credibly promise and deliver two-day shipping on the categories where Amazon relies on slower cross-border fulfilment would have a genuine conversion argument. This is precisely the territory Woolworths' MyDeal integration is trying to exploit — Australian-stocked inventory with Woolworths' distribution network.
Three plausible scenarios for Australian e-commerce leadership in 2027 — and one common thread running through all of them.
In every scenario, logistics execution and data advantage separate winners from followers. The question is which player delivers on both.
The base case is the most defensible given current evidence: Amazon extends its marketplace lead, the supermarkets solidify grocery e-commerce dominance and make modest general merchandise gains, and the third tier (Kogan, Catch, MyDeal) consolidates through fee pressure and attrition. This outcome requires no dramatic strategic shift from any incumbent — it is the direction current momentum is already pointing.
- MyDeal reaches $1.4B GMV in FY2026
- Woolworths grocery shoppers shift 10%+ of non-grocery spend to MyDeal
- Coles launches a comparable general merchandise marketplace
- Prime subscriber base grows to 5–6M
- Coles automated warehouse advantage narrows to parity with Woolworths by FY2027
- Kogan or Catch exits or merges under fee war pressure
- Temu and Shein expand category breadth into home goods and electronics
- TikTok Shop launches in Australia with integrated checkout
- Australian incumbents fail to launch a structural low-price or social commerce response by mid-2026
The bull case for challengers requires Woolworths' MyDeal integration to actually work at scale: seller fee cuts translate into a meaningfully wider product range, Woolworths' 15-million-plus grocery shoppers shift meaningful general merchandise spending to MyDeal, and Coles responds with an equivalent marketplace integration. That chain of events is plausible but unproven — the GMV targets MyDeal has set for FY2026 will be the first real test.
The bear case is a market disrupted by forces none of the incumbents are currently addressing: Temu and Shein continue building habitual purchasing among under-25s, social commerce platforms (TikTok Shop, Instagram) emerge as a meaningful discovery and transaction channel, and Australian consumers normalise buying directly from Chinese manufacturers without a domestic marketplace intermediary. In this scenario, the fee battles between Kogan, Catch, and MyDeal become irrelevant because the customers have moved somewhere else entirely.
Key things to remember
About About this report
This report maps the competitive structure of Australian e-commerce in 2025–2026, covering the major players, how each wins business, where fees and fulfilment are being used as weapons, and where the market leadership fights will be decided.
Investors, founders, and analysts who need a sourced field map of Australian e-commerce — not a market sizing exercise.
Ren synthesised research from Tier 2 industry sources (Mordor Intelligence, Statista, Morningstar analyst reports, Australia Post data), Tier 3 seller-facing platform documentation, and publicly available web traffic and ASX-adjacent data. No Tier 1 consulting firm reports (McKinsey, Deloitte, BCG) were available for this specific market and period.
Most traffic and market share figures are from 2023–2024; fee structures reflect Q1 2026 seller documentation; some GMV and penetration figures are from H2 2025 ASX updates — all dates are flagged inline.
Sources Sources & Methodology
Research conducted 10 Apr 2026. All statistics carry inline citation markers.
Australian e-commerce total market size — Ocean Port Link (2025): estimates imply ~AUD$69 billion (2024 base) vs Market Research reports: USD$56.85 billion (2025 estimate) and USD$81.13 billion (2023). Wide variance across sources likely reflects differences in scope (B2C only vs. B2C+B2B, domestic vs. including cross-border). No single figure is used as definitive in this report — market size is not the report's focus and figures are not cited as settled fact.
MyDeal GMV and fee cut details — Research data citing Woolworths ASX filing (August 2025): $1.2B FY2025 GMV, 20% seller onboarding growth vs No independent Tier 1 or Tier 2 source corroborating specific GMV or commission cut percentages. MyDeal figures are presented as indicative and directional. The pattern of behaviour (fee cuts, seller growth) is consistent with Woolworths' stated strategy even if specific figures could not be independently verified. Confidence rated MEDIUM.
No Tier 1 consulting firm reports (McKinsey, BCG, Deloitte, PwC, Bain, Gartner, Forrester, IDC) were available for Australian e-commerce competitive dynamics in 2025–2026. All confidence ratings for market-specific claims are capped at MEDIUM as a result.
No verified 2024–2025 customer satisfaction ratings from named platforms (ProductReview.com.au, Trustpilot, Google Reviews) were available for Kogan, Catch, The Iconic, or Big W online. The Amazon Australia rating is the only cross-verified public satisfaction data point. Satisfaction comparisons across competitors are not possible from this evidence base.
No official market share percentages (percentage of total Australian e-commerce revenue) from named research firms are available for any individual player in 2025 or 2026. Traffic figures (monthly visits) are used as a proxy but do not equate to revenue share.
Specific strategic moves by Wesfarmers OneDigital — including any marketplace, logistics, or technology investments between January 2024 and April 2026 — are not covered in the available research. This is a notable gap given Wesfarmers' stated digital ambitions.
The Iconic's specific financial performance, seller economics, and competitive tactics are not captured in the available research beyond qualitative positioning as an apparel specialist.
This report is produced for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. All data is sourced from publicly available information as at the date of research. Renatus Ventures makes no representations as to the completeness or accuracy of third-party data.